Response
A critique of ‘A re-evaluation of tense in isiZulu’
Literator | Vol 37, No 1 | a1349 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v37i1.1349
| © 2016 Lionel Posthumus
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 16 September 2016 | Published: 27 October 2016
Submitted: 16 September 2016 | Published: 27 October 2016
About the author(s)
Lionel Posthumus, Department of African Languages, University of Johannesburg, South AfricaAbstract
This article is a response to Groenewald’s 2014 article, ‘A re-evaluation of tense in isiZulu’. Sub-themes identified in Groenewald’s article and explored in this exposé in the light of an array of recently published research on the topic of tense are: the suitability of the distinction between absolute and relative tense and the use of the term ‘absolute tense’; the appropriateness of defining tense in terms of deixis; the remoteness distinctions in terms of past and future tenses generally distinguished in the Bantu languages with particular reference to isiZulu; the semantic significance of the use of the so-called short and long forms of the present and past tenses of isiZulu and the naming of the individual tenses.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2820Total article views: 4702
Crossref Citations
1. Comments on ‘A critique of “A re-evaluation of tense in isiZulu”’ by Lionel Posthumus
Manie Groenewald
Literator vol: 37 issue: 1 year: 2016
doi: 10.4102/lit.v37i1.1326